Category Archives: Photography

Botching Two Rolls of Film Just for Fun!

Not too horribly long ago, I got two new old cameras. The first was a 1936 Ikoflex, a sophisticated little camera that should take some great shots. The next was a 1940 Kodak Popular Brownie, a simple box camera.

After shooting a roll on each of them, I’m sort of disappointed with myself.

The Ikoflex had all that fancy photography stuff like aperture settings and different shutter speeds. It’s very capable of capturing some fine photos. Most of the roll, however, was washed out, except for the first photo.

See?

So what happened? It’s rather embarrassing. I forgot that the aperture settings are measured “backwards.” Meaning, when you open the iris, the numbers decrease rather than increase. I had it backwards. It’s been awhile since I really thought about f/stops. I had the camera set for f5ish for most of the time in the sunny desert. That’s bound to end badly when shooting on 100 speed film.

The Popular Brownie, however, might have to be my dark winter camera. This one has no aperture settings and has no adjustable shutter speed. It’s a very simple point and shoot. When it was made, seventy or so years ago, I’m sure it worked just fine. But since then, the spring has probably gotten a little weak and the shutter speed has slowed a bit.

This gives you some washed out photos, which is a real shame. The two that you see here were the only things that came out. Everything else was almost completely white.

Thankfully, Seattle is typically cloudy, so from October through May, this camera will work just fine. It’ll take some experimenting, but I bet I can find the right conditions for it.

A New New Old Camera! The 1940 Popular Brownie

A few weeks ago, Kripamoya from the UK spotted a box camera at a rummage sale and, much to my great delight and surprise, thought of me. He picked it up and shipped it to me. I got it yesterday and, when I opened the box, did a little happy dance.

I love old cameras. It’s not that it’s “the older the better,” but anything pre-WW2 is such fun. This one is a Kodak Six-20 Popular Brownie. This model was made in the UK somewhere between 1939 to 1943. Like my other Brownie, it takes larger photos, with a negative measuring 2.25″ X 3.45″. You only get eight shots per roll of 120 film, but they are eight amazingly fun pictures.

Rummage sale finds are always hit or miss, especially when it comes to old technology. But this little camera works perfectly. I cleaned the front and back of the lens and it’s ready for some film.

This model takes 620 film, just like my 1950 Duaflex II. To make 120 film fit into a 620 camera, all you have to do is trim the edges off of the 120 film spools. It’s pretty easy and usually works. It totally works for the Pop Brownie.

When Smartz and I take to the Utah desert (and beyond), this new old camera will be accompanying us. Hopefully, I’ll return with eight amazing shots.

So, thank you, Kripamoya! I’m ridiculously excited to start shooting!

Forgotten Roll of Film

Oh my! I thought I had posted all of the photos from film that I had. But no, there was another roll just sitting there collecting virtual dust.

And lucky me (and you), this is my favorite film so far – FujiChrome Provia 100.

I took this shots before leaving on the Memorial Day trip to Oregon. The first four were taken at Larabee Beach near Bellingham, Washington.

We saw over 100 purple star fish there. Some people call them “sea stars,” but those people need lives.

I guess I like this film because it can give some really realistic colors when it wants to.

But dips into weird darkness when it feels like it.

I’m sure it had more to do with the sun and the plastic toy camera that I was using than the film itself.

Oh, take a look at this picture. It’s the wonderful neon Portland sign defaced by the asshat trying to lease out space in the building. This is worse than pointless graffiti.

Sometimes it would be nice for these shots to work out. But the sun is full of glare.

Little known fact: You can focus a Holga. In this photo, I forgot to. Some people say that it doesn’t make a difference where the focus is, but these people aren’t quite right. For far away shots, it really doesn’t matter. But when you get closer, it certainly does.

I’ve been thinking about which one of my cameras I like best. It’s really hard to figure out. The Holga is fun and simple. I like that. It produces some interesting shots with happy accidents. But sometimes I just want a nice shot.

New Old Camera from Pre-War Germany!

A couple of weeks ago, I found myself in possession of a new old camera. It’s a 1936, German-made Zeiss-Ikon Ikoflex II.

By a long stretch, this is the most sophisticated film camera that I own, having a working aperture and ability to focus. The Holga, and even the 1914 Kodak Brownie, have that, but this is more precise. Also, being a twin lens reflex camera, you can see the changes you make in focus through the viewfinder. Whatever you do to the exposure lens is also done to the viewing lens. This seems cumbersome, but it works. It’s even got shutterspeed settings!

Unlike every other 120 camera that I have, the Ikoflex doesn’t have a little red window in the back to let you know which photo you’re on. See, 120 film has a paper backing. Printed on the backing are numbers corresponding to the exposure you’re on.

bark bark bark

This one, however, has a more modern exposure counter. While nifty, this presents a problem.

See, film of the 1930s was actually a bit thicker than film made today. This matters because the exposures are counted by by the pressure of the film against one of the rollers. As it was originally thicker, the roll on the take up reel was thicker.

This really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, but it seems to be true. The thinner film of today winds tighter and makes the exposures overlap. So while the exposure counter technically works, it’s a bit off and all your photos run together.

Tape it up!

This can be handled in one of two ways, both of which achieve the same result. Some folks cut out a piece of paper about three inches long, the same thickness as the film, and taping one end to the take up reel and the other to the film. Others just wrap some tape around the take up reel. Both make the take up reel thicker and thus makes you have to turn the advancer knob less (and thus it brings the counter to a more accurate state, so your photos won’t overlap).

Film is here now!

Most folks seem to use two layers of masking tape. But then other folks don’t notice a problem at all. This is because, even today, all films are of a different thickness. It’s rather random and I have no idea what to do about it aside from trial and error. But trial and error is why I got into film in the first place.

Ready to go!

I’m hoping to get some great shots with it. We shall see.

My Love / Hate Relationship with Instagram

While trekking across the country in 2004, taking pictures along the way, I discovered my love for photography. When I got back, I decided that I wanted to do something with some of the photos that I took. I loved the way old medium format, square holiday photos looked and wanted to replicate that by using Photoshop.

Early attempt in Photoshop.

I would spend hours, even days on each picture, painstakingly adjusting contrast, color, shadow, etc., just so they might look like old vacation shots captured on medium format film. It was no easy task. You had to get the colors just so, had to have the contrasts just right.

From 2004 through 2010, I performed this bit of hocus pocus on hundreds of pics. But when Instagram got huge in late 2010, it threw me for a loop. What took me hours and hours could now be done in mere seconds.

Instagram users can take a photo on their smart phones, push a button and through the use of digital filters, make their image appear like something taken with a medium format camera. It even puts a black frame around it that one would get if they scanned in negatives from real film. Yeah, I know, Instagram doesn’t force you to use filters. But everyone does. Pretty much always.

Another Photoshopped image.

This app took off. Literally tens of millions of people use this. Suddenly, what I had been doing for years wasn’t unique, it was common.

For a long time, I just stopped manipulating photos. I was immediately turned off by Instagram and to this day have never signed up or downloaded it. Not as a form of protest, but out of simple curiosity, I decided to start using film. I bought a $25 Holga and have experimented quite a bit with it and other medium format cameras. I’m hooked.

Instagram Cracker

And yet, Instagram is a part of my daily life. I’ve developed a love/hate relationship with it. For all the reasons above, I hate it. I don’t care for how easy it is to get the results that took me hours. I don’t like how they put a black frame around the photos to make it look like a certain kind of film (a kind of film that I actually use).

On the other hand, a lot of good has come from it. First, it was because of Instagram that I eventually wound up using real film. It’s also good that so many folks use it as I think it makes people take a lot more photos than they usually would. Now I get to see pictures of friends and their kids that I wouldn’t otherwise see. That really is a wonderful thing. If it took something like Instagram to make that happen, so be it. Oh, and I really really like Postagram. It’s a great idea and I hope it catches on in a very big way.

Photo taken with FujiChrome Provia 100 film.

So, I’m not some “real film only” snob that looks down upon digital photographers and Instagram users. I realize that film isn’t for everyone. Digital is a whole lot easier and cheaper and the perfect medium for pretty much everybody. But there’s just something that irks me about Instagram. It’s the same thing that bugs me about Tumblr. Maybe it’s how easy both platforms make it to be lazy and “artistic” at the same time. Maybe it’s the ironic hipster appeal. Maybe it’s just me being grumpy (get off my lawn!). Yeah, it’s probably that.

I Need a Cloudy Day Film

Kodak’s Porta 400 was the first film I used in the Holga (not that long ago). It was suggested to me as a good film with fine grain and forgiving in bad lighting. All of those things were true. The film is also used by photographers who want to accurately capture skin tones. It provides a fairly subdued saturation with mild contrast.

The Pacific Northwest is strange in its lighting. It can be a “sunny” day, yet still be mostly cloudy. It’s nice that the sun shines, but it’s a very muted light. As seen in this post, it can be challenging to capture. A 400 speed film allows you to take photos on bright or dim days with very little variation in the final outcome (sort of).

The problem, for me anyway, is that I don’t really like how Porta 400 looks.

Sometimes you can get these really saturated colors with a whited out sky…

Other times, you get whatever this is. Compare this shot to another from the same location using the 1914 Brownie and a cross processed slide film (Velvia 100). These were literally taken within a minute of each other.

I guess my biggest problem is the lack of contrast. It’s a very soft photo. I do like how it deals with greens, but the softness bugs me a little.

All that said, I don’t think I really could have taken this shot with 100 speed film (with a Holga, anyway). There just isn’t enough light or slow enough shutter speed to do it. So 400 speed film allows me to capture shots that I wouldn’t normally be able to get. But if I don’t really like them, what’s the point?

But living up here, you do need a 400 speed film. For that, I might start testing out others. There is a Porta 400VC (“vivid color”) that boots both saturation and contrast. There’s also FujiChrome’s Provia 400X, which is high in saturation. That’s about it, however. It’s becoming harder and harder to find film these days, and so the odd ball stuff is getting phased out. And there is, of course, always expired film.

Shooting with Expired Film – Capturing the Real with the Surreal

Film, like food, has an expiration date. Unlike food, however, you can still use it long after the date has passed. The results vary greatly upon how the film was stored.

I recently picked up some Kodak Ektachrome that expired in 1989. It’s slide film, which makes it touchy and fairly unforgiving, especially in a Holga – a plastic toy camera with two aperture settings (F8 and F11). It’s also 64ISO, a slow film that requires a lot of light. It being over 20 years old makes it even less photo sensitive, and so it requires pretty much the brightest day ever.

We don’t have a lot of those in the Pacific Northwest, and so, when I tried to shoot with this, I got some mixed results.

US Route 30 in Oregon has a lot of old bridges. Apparently, in the early 1900s, the highways were made with people in mind. Many of the bridges have walkways so you can check out the bridge and the stream/waterfalls, etc. It’s great! The world under the bridge is dark and green and just fascinating. It looks different from how this photo captured it, but it feels exactly like this. Dark and gritty.

Like with the Provia 100F that I recently shot with, I needed more light for this low speed film. This is, I believe, the Painted Hills. I waited for the sun to come out. It did and this is still what I got.

Hey there, sun! This was at the Sumpter Valley Railroad and the sun was wonderful bright! This is exactly what I’m looking for in desert film.

We rode in the cupola of the caboose and I was able to squeeze my head and camera out of the window to take this shot looking out towards the locomotive. It’s a bit dark and ill-defined, but still fun.

There’s something about a porch with a lazy boy recliner upon it that just makes you take a photo. There’s quite a bit of grain in this shot, but i think it still works.

I captured this building with three different cameras using three different films. I have no idea which is my favorite, but I do like this one. The shadows are great and the sky is a deep blue.

This is Cathedral Rock in the John Day Fossil Beds. This, like a lot of the other landscape shots that I’ve taken, really captures the feel of the land.

And that’s what I like about shooting on strange film stock with a Holga. It doesn’t give you a realistic view of what the subject looked like. What it does give you is how it felt to be there. We see a lot of surreal landscapes out here. They’re impossible to capture on an image. I’ve tried with digital for years and nothing does the landscape justice.

The odd filmstock that I’ve been using doesn’t accurate capture it either, but it tends to reproduce the off-kilter feel, the unusual panorama.

My favorite film to shoot on is FujiChrome Provia 100, but this might come in a close second once I figure out exactly how to use it.