Posts RSS Comments RSS

Watching which “facts” we use

Sometimes people of faith, devotees in particular, try to make themselves and their philosophies seem more advanced by making people who aren’t like them seem worse. This is hardly fine for discussions with like-minded believers, let alone if you’re trying to convince or convert the same people you’re insulting.

An example of this would be a recent “Thought of the Day” post by an initiating ISKCON guru about Obama (a supposed supporter of pro-choice) winning the election:

It’s actually unthinkable that we are living in the midst of a baby-killing civilization. But yet it is a fact. This is not human civilization. This is lower than animal civilization. Which animals do we see that kill their own offspring? When the foolish people of a nation choose leaders who support the killing of innocent children within the womb, it is a bleak day indeed for that nation.

[My emphasis.]

Which animals do we see that kill their own offspring? Quite a lot, really. Many animals engage in what zoologists refer to as “infanticide.” If you have ever raised hamsters, puppies or kittens or been anywhere near a farm, you would know that this practice (more properly, “instinct”) is very common. It’s also on Wikipedia, if anyone is interested.

To try to use it in an analogy to prove that the “karmis” are worse than animals because they elected Obama makes the whole argument sound even sillier than it already is (and I’m not even close to being an Obama supporter). In fact, it calls into question the sanity of the entire philosophy.

If someone hears something obviously wrong in what we’re saying, it makes them wonder if the rest of our philosophy is wrong. I’m not talking about opinions and things people can disagree with (evolution, abortion, etc). I’m talking about facts. In this example, it is a commonly known fact that many, many animals kill their young. To say animals don’t kill their young is sloppy, misinformed and most importantly makes the reader wonder if everything else said (the stuff that’s actually about the philosophy) is wrong.

I’ve taken issue with this particular devotee’s writings before. Specifically a bizarre letter to the “great hero” George W. Bush… (My “favorite” part is when he says that Bush was “re-elected with such an overwhelming majority of the voters’ support.” What?! How about a little fact-checking here.

When seen together, the political leanings are obvious. But that’s not what I’m looking for in a spiritual leader. If I wanted political leanings, I’d listen to NPR or watch Fox News.

Please, to our gurus and supposedly fit leaders, give us some real spirituality! We’re not just ripe for it, we’re rotting for want of it!




Related posts:

  1. More on ghosts – facts, ideas and personal experiences from NV
  2. Two democrats who don’t impress me.
  3. Anti-War? Voting for Obama?
  4. This democracy is demon-crazy
  5. I would like to see it, but…

21 responses so far

RSS feed

21 Comments »

Comment by devadevaNo Gravatar Mac OS X Safari 525.20.1
2008-11-19 16:20:18

man, i wish you didn’t post those links. i so wish you didn’t. but yeah, made me look.

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-19 16:33:03

Believe me, I wish I wouldn’t have seen them. The first was on Planet ISKCON yesterday or the day before. The Bush one was sent out over his Ultimate Enlightenment Course thing a couple of years ago.

It’s just weird.

 
 
Comment by Prema-Rupa ddNo Gravatar Mac OS X Safari 525.22
2008-11-19 19:10:48

I love that last line you wrote. I dunno how to describe it. I just love it.

And its true, if a person wants to be a leader they’ve got to choose their words carefully. It would have been better if he said “this is animal civilization”. And maybe make a point about how we need to transcend the materialistic propensity of identifying with the body and having unwanted children etc. etc.

Also, I dont think its correct for a spiritual leader to show a blatant political persuasion. Whether he was talking about McCain, Obama, Bush, Cthulhu… I think to a devotee, unless that person is Prahalad Maharaj or someone else from SB, every candidate for presidency totally sucks.

Word.

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-19 21:28:17

It’s just true. We are rotting and the more I look at it, the less I see anything changing for the better. Devotees keep telling me that it will get better, but nobody can show proof and that’s just sad.

A true spiritual leader isn’t concerned with politics, especially today’s politics, anymore than they should be concerned with Miley Cirus or the new Madonna album. It’s the same thing. Yes, pay attention to what’s going on, but what this devotee wrote was silly and makes me question him even more than I have been before.

I really am trying not to fault find, but we, as disciples, *are* supposed to try to find the spiritual qualities in a spiritual master. If someone doesn’t meet those standards (standards that are clear enough that even neophytes can discern them), it should be at least brought up.

For me, it reinforces the opinion I had of him the very first time I read something he wrote (long before the Bush letter).

Nevertheless, it’s depressing.

Comment by KateNo Gravatar Mac OS X Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.14
2008-11-20 15:21:20

Not a spiritual leader but totally concerned with the new Madonna album.

Seriously though, I couldn’t agree with your post more.

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 15:25:00

The new Madonna album was the first thing that came to mind! I thought for a bit and then just blurted it out. Hm… And I still can’t think of something else to use. hehe

Comment by KateNo Gravatar Mac OS X Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.14
2008-11-21 13:18:44

It is a totally appropriate thing to blurt out.

I love the album and i just saw her in concert last week! WOW-WEEEEEEE

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-21 17:18:58

… seriously?

I just didn’t see that coming from you. You know, since you’re not a thirty something gay man. :)

Comment by KateNo Gravatar Mac OS X Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.14
2008-11-21 19:11:30

I grew up on Madonna. My dad used to wish I could learn my times tables as easily as Madonna songs. My dad kind of bribed me into moving to the US because this was where Madonna lived. I had no idea how far from CA and NY, Texas was. :)

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-21 19:31:16

Hey! We can get Kate to do anything! Just say that Madonna will be thereish!

I grew up on Duran Duran, so I do understand it a bit. Though I’m NOT a fan of their newest album. Seriously… Justin Timberlake?! Come on, guys!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comment by RatiNo Gravatar Windows XP Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 06:37:02

The letter to Bush is just so funny. Is that actually a hing article?
I can just imagine Bush (if he actually read things like that) saying, “Hey, this Hare Krishna guy seems pretty cool. I’d like to meet him and hear more of his ideas.”

He writes:

“When the foolish people of a nation choose leaders who support the killing of innocent children within the womb, it is a bleak day indeed for that nation.”

But at the same time apparently has so much admiration for a cow killer. Hypocrisy anyone?

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 15:25:56

See, it’s things like this that keep me from coming up with ideas for The Hing. How can I top the letter to Bush or the guru school? I can’t. I just can’t complete with the surreality of real life ISKCON.

Comment by RatiNo Gravatar Windows XP Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-21 06:41:49

Oh! It really is so sad isn’t it?
I’d like to have a “gurukula” where former students of the actual gurukula are in charge. And their specific job description is to recreate an authentic experience for the “students.” Now THAT would be some awesome reality tv.

 
 
Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 15:26:41

Oh, and good point about the cow killing being ok. You think a realized soul would get that. I know I get it and I’m FAR from realized.
Ugh.

 
 
Comment by Ryan BeggarNo Gravatar Mac OS X Safari 525.22
2008-11-20 18:08:31

for that matter what about all the adult humans bush has allowed to kill and be killed in iraq and afghanistan? bush doesn’t seem terribly concerned with the sanctity of life, and a guru should realize that.

also a spiritual person isn’t concerned with the new madonna album but does know the lyrics to ‘lucky star’

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 19:37:12

I was going to mention the Iraq war, but it’s so “easy” for Bush supporters to pretend that there’s a need for the US to be there. Just like Clinton supporters pretended that there was a reason for the US to be in Kosovo (and Iraq).

If a spiritual leader *doesn’t* know early Madonna, i’m suspect. But not nearly as suspect as I would be if they knew current Madonna (ew!).

 
Comment by RatiNo Gravatar Windows XP Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-21 06:37:17

So, if I know the lyrics to lucky star does that automatically mean I’m spiritually advanced?

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-21 17:18:12

Pretty much, yes. More so than most, anyway.

 
 
 
Comment by JennNo Gravatar Windows Vista Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 18:44:27

Well said. Nice to see some sanity on an issue as inflammatory as this. And actually, infanticide was and is an important part of human culture. There are cultures extant today, like the Saniyo-Hiyowe of Papua New Guinea, who engage in infanticide to help the whole of the population survive. Although many of these women report regret, they believe it is necessary, and when you think of the hazards of survival, how can one argue with that logic? (See: Medical Anthropology in Ecological Perspective by Ann McElroy and Pat Townsend)

Does it make a Western woman (or family) any different because she seeks out a sanitized, surgical process before the child is even born? Does it not achieve the same end? In tribal culture, women who engage in infanticide usually do so because they have other young children who have not yet been weaned. Ending the life of the newborn means the continued survival of the older, more established child. This is not religion or dogma. This is nature. Human nature is cultural so, doesn’t it make sense that infanticide as our cultural norm manifests as what we call abortion?

In whichever God we believe, we pray for a world in which all children are viable and embraced with love. Arguing about this in such a divisive and uninformed way is counter-intuitive, yo.

Comment by JennNo Gravatar Windows Vista Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 18:58:13

Oh wait, let me clarify:

In whichever way we believe in God, we pray for a world in which all children are viable and embraced with love.

Comment by ericNo Gravatar Ubuntu Linux Mozilla Firefox 3.0.4
2008-11-20 19:34:11

I think what bothered me most about this is that it was divisive. Yes, we, like most religions, disagree with the practice of abortion. However, for a spiritual leader to write like this, especially when it’s about an election, is cheap.

It’s no secret that I don’t really agree with the idea of government. However, I agree even less with religion/spirituality being involved in government. Not because it taints the government (cause really, can’t get much worse), but because it taints religion.

 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.